Difference: Summer2013 (12 vs. 13)

Revision 132013-07-19 - dkcira

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"

Summer Students 2013

Table of contents:
Line: 20 to 20
 Natalie Harrison

Ian Wessen

Ian Wessen
Added:
>
>
Higgs physics through two decay channels, H → γ γ and H → WW

H → γ γ : Superior resolution of ECAL and the clean kinematics of photon final states enable kinematic reconstruction of parent particles with great accuracy. I want to parametrize a fitting function against Monte Carlo Standard Model background processes and then compare this to the data from the photon photon final state. The pulls on the fit parameters suggest how well our standard model and the data from CMS agree.

H → WW : The decay to two W contains a lot of kinematic information, but there are many challenges is distinguishing our signal from background. Background sources of missing energy and dilepton final states require a series of discriminating cuts. My analysis focuses on vector boson fusion Higgs production with a characteristic 2-jet final state. By carefully choosing events with these signatures, we can then apply kinematic analysis à la razor techniques to learn about the Higgs.

 

Da An

Da An

Valère Lambert

Line: 45 to 52
 

Christopher Hayes

Marco Cruz-Heredia

Added:
>
>
 Marco Cruz-Heredia
Added:
>
>
Muon Test Lab

I will be analyzing the data from the muon test in the Lauristen laboratory. In particular, at this first stage I will be using the ROOT physics analysis framework to get the spectrum of energy deposited by cosmic muons in a LYSO crystal as well as the rise time and decay time of such a device.

 

Michaelangelo Lucas

Michaelangelo Lucas
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback